Skip to content

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pyup-bot pyup-bot commented Jun 8, 2020

This PR updates pylint from 2.5.2 to 2.5.3.

Changelog

2.5.3

===========================

Release date: 2020-06-8

* Fix a regression where disable comments that have checker names with numbers in them are not parsed correctly

Close 3666

* `property-with-parameters` properly handles abstract properties

Close 3600

* `continue-in-finally` no longer emitted on Python 3.8 where it's now valid

Close 3612

* Fix a regression where messages with dash are not fully parsed

Close 3604

* In a TOML configuration file, it's now possible to use rich (non-string) types, such as list, integer or boolean instead of strings. For example, one can now define a *list* of message identifiers to enable like this::

 enable = [
     "use-symbolic-message-instead",
     "useless-suppression",
 ]

Close 3538

* Fix a regression where the score was not reported with multiple jobs

Close 3547

* Protect against `AttributeError` when checking `cell-var-from-loop`

Close 3646
Links

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 743

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 0.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 737: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 0
Relevant Lines: 0

💛 - Coveralls

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 8, 2020

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 743

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 0.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 737: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 0
Relevant Lines: 0

💛 - Coveralls

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #184

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Aug 21, 2020
@avara1986 avara1986 deleted the pyup-update-pylint-2.5.2-to-2.5.3 branch August 21, 2020 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants